回答: black hole must be valid, given general relativity is valid 由 wujian 于 July 13, 2008 15:54:12:

any theory may have defect. I wish you check the definition of black hole to make sure you understand what a black hole means. In small scale, there is so called "uncertainty principle" in quantum mechanics. Here there is also similar "uncertainty principle" in large scale for black hole. Be serious for your life time to think about "uncertainty principle". www.6park.com

For real physicists such as Richard Feynman, there is NO strong hard data for black hole; but there is hope for this art to be realized for scientific subject in physics. That is why there is still some amount of fund for such research. For mathematicians, black hole can be research topic which does not need to have hard data support.

• enough evidence of not is not relavent - wujian (627 bytes) 7/13/08 (4)
  • You need to have basic training - fundon (992 bytes) 7/13/08 (3)
    • Feynman(1918-1985), What a young man! - 马列主义 (0 bytes) 7/15/08 (0)
    • 哈 Creationists use similar arguments to - 马列主义 (1052 bytes) 7/14/08 (0)
    • seems you are a big fan of Feynman - wujian (550 bytes) 7/14/08 (0)